|
|
Archives:Dividends vs. Salary for Businessesby Roy A. Lewis, E.A. The 2003 Tax Act provided almost everybody a chance for tax savings. Individuals certainly received some of the greatest tax benefits. But there were also many tax breaks for businesses. And there are some even more interesting opportunities for owners of closely held corporations and even "S" type corporations. The old rules Take the example of Mr. Big and his C corporation. Prior to the 2003 Tax Act, Mr. Big's corporation generated about $50,000 in corporation profit. Because of his salary, Mr. Big was already in the highest marginal tax bracket (38.6%). The corporation tax on the $50,000 in corporation profits would amount to 15% of the corporation taxable income, or $7,500. If Mr. Big then removed these corporation profits in the form of dividends, he would also pay taxes at his tax rate of 38.6%. So there would be a total tax bite of $26,800 on this $50,000 dividend distribution. That's almost 54% in taxes. Ouch. So instead, Mr. Big would take a year-end bonus of $50,000. Since wages paid by a corporation (unlike dividends paid) are deductible by the corporation, taking this salary would knock his corporation profit down to zero, and he'd simply pay the $20,750 ($19,300 in federal taxes and another $1,450 in employer/employee Medicare taxes) and go on his way. Anybody can see that paying $20,750 is much better than paying $26,800. The dawning of a new day Let's look at the numbers again, using the new law. The corporation profit remains at $50,000. Therefore, the corporation taxes on this profit still amount to 15%, or $7,500. But under the new laws, when Mr. Big takes this $50,000 of corporation profit in dividends, he'll pay only another $7,500 (15% maximum tax on dividends) in taxes. That's a total tax of $15,000. If Mr. Big decides to take this $50,000 out in the form of a year-end bonus, he would pay $17,500 in regular income taxes and another $1,450 (in Medicare payroll taxes) for a grand total of $18,950. Under the new law, taking a dividend would actually save Mr. Big about $3,950 in tax dollars. Warnings! Now, if the IRS sees a corporation that has never paid dividends in the past but is now paying out substantial amounts of dividends, some questions might be asked. And that might raise the question of excess compensation in prior years. So this strategy isn't entirely without risk. But if the payment of dividends is done with some thought and planning, the shareholder should be able to fend off any attacks from the IRS. Small business ("S" type) corporations If that's the case, there is nothing under the new law that disallows paying qualified dividends from those accumulated earnings and profits. And those qualifying dividends will be subject to the lower tax rates. To make things even sweeter, if some of the shareholders of the S corporation are in lower tax brackets, the dividends might be taxed at a rate much lower than 15%, perhaps down to 5% or even zero. The brass tax Related Links: If you like the way Roy Lewis simplifies confusing tax issues, check out his just-published book, The Motley Fool's Investment Tax Guide 2002: Smart Tax Strategies for Investors. This handy 360+ page guide covers just about every tax aspect of a typical Fool's life: investing, marriage, children, education, homes, home offices, retirement accounts, medical expenses, and much more.) January 2, 2004
|
What We Do
Other Services:
Who We Are
Archives:
Links |
||
|
|||
|
Roy A. Lewis, E.A. is the "Tax Guru" |
|||